A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Rating Coffee

The rating system I started with and still stick to today is a straight forward and super simple four-point scale:

4 – Organize your life around this coffee. Drop everything, re-schedule your appointments or plan a trip if necessary.

3 – Good coffee. A small detour will be well-rewarded.

2 – It’s coffee. It’s caffeinated. It’ll do.

1 – Danger, Will Robinson!

The only additional bit of complexity you should know about are pluses and minuses that I may (or may not) append to each number as needed.

Overall, I like my system quite a bit. It quickly signals to the reader whether a coffee or cafe is thumbs up (3 or 4) or thumbs down (1 or 2) and reflects a more nuanced system most of us are familiar with – a grade point average system (A/4, B/3, C/2, D/1). My system falls short of the complexity and nuance offered by the 100-point system used by those in the coffee industry. But then again, while that system may work well for a single cup of coffee, it can’t tell you much about an entire cafe.

That said, my rating system isn’t perfect for a cafe either. After all, what if the drip is good, but the espresso bad? What if the cafe offers a fantastic space, with only mediocre coffee? What about consumer choice and quality of service? My feeling is that these factors are where good old-fashioned words become important. As a qualitative researcher, I try to capture these elements in writing. If you’re in doubt, let me know in the comments. In the mean time, I’ll try to establish a more well-defined set of measures I tend to look for and how they factor into my overall decision.